Academic journal “Eurasian Union: Issues of International Relations”. Volume 9, Issue 1 (31), 2020.
CONTENTS
POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS AND PROCESSES
WORLD POLICY AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS AND PROCESSES
DOI 10.35775/PSI.2020.31.1.001
Sh.S. SULEYMANOVA Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor, Department of Public Relations and media policies of the Faculty of Journalism IGSU RANEPA under the President of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
INFLUENCE OF AUTHOR'S JOURNALISM ON THE MODERN MEDIA SPACE
The article discusses issues related to such new areas in modern media space as gonzo-journalism, its influence. Based on the history of the development of copyright journalism, a new concept is also revealed – a style called gonzo journalism. The author also analyzes the concepts – position, duty of a journalist and social responsibility.
Key words: journalism, influence, media space, author journalism, gonzo-journalism, position, social responsibility.
DOI 10.35775/PSI.2020.31.1.002
V.F. PRYAKHIN D.Sc. (political science), Professor (International Relations Dept., RSHU), Professor (Diplomacy Dept., MGIMO-University), Moscow, Russia
ON GOD, ON SOUL, CORONAVIRUS AND CONSTITUTION. PHILOSOPHICAL NOTES OF A POLITICAL SCIENTIST
The discussion around the amendments to the Constitution revealed a number of gaps in our public consciousness. One such obvious gap is the lack of basic worldview guidelines. The concept of God is just such a basic guideline. Therefore, the proposal to mention God in the text of the Basic Law raised a number of questions that revealed a lack of public understanding of what, in fact, is being discussed.
This article contains an author's interpretation of the scientific political aspects of this topic in both national and global contexts.
Key words: God, worldview, idealism, materialism, positivism, religion, Constitution, politics, passionarity, spirituality, consumerism, new political thinking, globalization, global problems, pandemic.
DOI 10.35775/PSI.2020.31.1.003
V.А. ZHALNIN Рost-graduate student, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia
THEORETICAL TOOLS FOR ANALYZING STATE POLICY IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE AS A CONFLICT OF GROUP AND PERSONAL INTERESTS
The topic indicated in the title occupies one of the most important or probably the most important place in the structure and content of the views of the expert Russian community that wants to understand the actual situation in the field of education and science, and, of course, in the state educational policy. The importance of this topic becomes all the more obvious against the background of the expected economic crisis and perhaps the socio-political crisis, agitated and stimulated by the current pandemic. According to some views, the crisis violates basic human values and the harmony in the system of relations between people and the state, between the state and society. Within the state and society, even relations in the field of education and science are plunging into a state of crisis. In fact, the crisis underlines the weak ability of politicians and political structures, thinkers and theorists to moderate their ambitions and find ways to subordinate these very ambitions to the interests of the state, and attract the state to the protection with all its might of the interests of the society, including teachers, students, scientists, schools and universities. The article uses the example of acute and even irreconcilable theoretical disputes concerning the present and future of Russian education and science to describe the fundamental misconceptions of one and another group of experts on this subject.
Key words: state policy, state policy in the field of education and science, theories about education.
WORLD POLICY AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
DOI 10.35775/PSI.2020.31.1.004
Z.K. AYUPOVA Doctor of Sciences (law), Professor of the Kazakh National Agrarian University, Fulbright scholar of the US Government, Academician of the Kazakhstan National Academy of Natural Sciences, Academician of the International Academy of Informatization, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan
D.U. KUSAINOV Doctor of Sciences (philosophy), Professor of the Kazakh National Pedagogical University named after Abai, Academician of the Kazakhstan National Academy of Natural Sciences, Academician of the International Academy of Informatization, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan
LEGAL GROUNDS OF MODERN MIGRATION PROCESSES IN THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN
In our state from the beginning of the development of sovereignty and independence harmonization of migratory processes behaves to one of the important directions of the policy of state and national safety. In accordance with the migration processes the legal frameworks of migratory legislation were formed and improved. The main purposes of the migratory policy of the country are the provision of the steady socio-economic and demographic development of our country, creation of all necessary terms for the realization of the rights for migrants, and also strengthening of the state security of the country. Modern Strategy of migratory politics defines the increasing integration of Kazakhstan into world cooperation of the country, determined by quality and quantity of the human potential in all the regions of the country.
Key words: migration, legal regulation, migratory politics, labour resources, diaspore, оralmans, repatriates, migratory streams.
DOI 10.35775/PSI.2020.31.1.005
S.G. KISELEV Doctor of Рhilosophical Sciences, Professor of the Department of international security and foreign policy of Russia Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), Professor, Department of Political Science, Institute of International Relations and Social and Political Sciences, MSLU, Professor of the Russian customs Academy, Moscow, Russia
EURASIA IS A SPACE OF GEOPOLITICAL AND GEO-CIVILIZATIONAL CONFRONTATION
The article considers the Eurasian space from the point of view of its unique geopolitical position in the context of global competitive confrontation; this position from the position of classical geopolitics is crucial in achieving world leadership. The author draws attention to the fact that the geopolitical, geostrategic and geocivilizational rivalry for control over Eurasia-the world's main geopolitical region – between the main global subjects of geopolitics has become more acute. The author justifies the expediency of strengthening Russia as the geopolitical center of the Eurasian space.
Key words: Eurasia, the Eurasian space, geopolitics, geo-political interests, geo-civilisations, geo-political control, expansion, competition, confrontation, geo-political and geo-civilizational issues.
DOI 10.35775/PSI.2020.31.1.006
HAFIZULLAH JAWAD Lecturer Faculty of Law and Political Science, Herat University, Afghanistan, postgraduate student, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Herat, Afghanistan
AHMAD FAVAD SEDIQ Lecturer Faculty of Law and Political Science, Herat University, Herat, Afghanistan
INVESTIGATING AFGHAN-EGYPTIAN DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS FROM INDEPENDENCE TO THE PRESENT DAY
This article provides an overview of the 90 years of diplomatic relations between Afghanistan and Egypt since independence. The differences in the nature of these relations during the respective periods of the monarchy, republic, communists, Islamic, Taliban, and the current government are evaluated. The author seeks to clarify the dimensions of diplomatic relations by separating the different periods and why diplomatic relations have changed at different times.
Documents and evidence show that in the years before independence, Afghanistan could not establish relations with foreign governments due to lack of independent foreign policy. The post-independence years provided the opportunity for the Afghan government to establish diplomatic relations with various countries. Egypt was one of the countries that showed great interest in building diplomatic relations. Taking into account the interests of the Egyptian King and the King of Afghanistan, these relations began at1928. The Afghan Political Mission started in Egypt in the year 1930, and then under the leadership of Mohammad Zahir Shah, the mission was upgraded to the highest level. After the fall of the royal regime, relations between Egypt and Afghanistan were heavily influenced by the policies of the great powers. During the communist regime these relations were severed completely. During the Mujahidin’s rule, the relations between the two sides have been restored and continue to this day. We seek to understand the ups and downs of our relations between the two countries and to examine the consequences of severing diplomatic relations between the two countries. The author of this article also makes some suggestions in this regard.
Key words: Afghanistan, Egypt, Relationship, diplomatic, Amanullah Khan, Malik Fuad and Foreign policy.